Add fat optional image flavor

[AutomationD]

Let me know if this is something you would like to add.

[tmaier]

This is related to #7.
However, I am still not convinced that this is needed.
If I would need any of this, I would run a dedicated image when necessary.
Just see my docker and github profiles. You will see lots of public images, dedicated for CI/CD.
I do have similar private images for my personal, non-public tooling

Could you please elaborate your use case? Best would be with examples.
It would be also great if other people would give their pros and cons for this.

[tmaier]

Please add system specifics to your personal global gitignore.
See https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files/#create-a-global-gitignore

[AutomationD]

Oops 👍🏻

[tmaier]

This looks a bit obscure for someone looking only for the slim version.
It would be great if we have a normal Dockerfile and a DaockerfileFat file, which is using the slim image as base image

[AutomationD]

Could be, but in the case of inheritance we will increase the amount of layers. Also, not sure how this will work with build matrix then.

[AutomationD]

My current use case is with gitlab (yes, similar issue to #7), and I agree that it is a little bit user-specific.
Although, to me, it seems that there could be a version of docker-compose-ci, which includes most of common CI utils.
For now Im building it by myself, It would just be nice to keep a ci (fat) version up-to-date alongside with build matrix updates.

[tmaier]

Closing this, following my comment above and the same rationale as #3