tock-rt0 related cosmetic changes.

[rajivr]

There are two changes in this PR.

1. Tree-wide rename of tock_rt0 to tock-rt0. This makes it consistent with other tock-* crate names.

2. Rename parameters to zero_bss to make it consistent with init_data.

[hudson-ayers]

I think you missed a few:

hudson: ~/tock ((HEAD detached at rajivr/for-upstream-15)) $ rg tock_rt0
chips/nrf52/src/crt1.rs
2:use tock_rt0;
168:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
169:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

chips/stm32f303xc/src/lib.rs
183:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
184:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

chips/stm32f4xx/src/lib.rs
93:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
94:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

chips/sam4l/src/lib.rs
111:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
112:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

arch/rv32i/src/lib.rs
94:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
95:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

chips/cc26x2/src/crt1.rs
2:use tock_rt0;
89:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
90:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

I'm actually confused why this compiles. How are those remaining tock_rt0 dependencies being resolved? I also see tock_rt0 in most of the cargo.lock files even after running a top-level make clean and rebuilding boards.

[rajivr]

I think you missed a few:

hudson: ~/tock ((HEAD detached at rajivr/for-upstream-15)) $ rg tock_rt0
chips/nrf52/src/crt1.rs
2:use tock_rt0;
168:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
169:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

chips/stm32f303xc/src/lib.rs
183:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
184:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

chips/stm32f4xx/src/lib.rs
93:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
94:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

chips/sam4l/src/lib.rs
111:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
112:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

arch/rv32i/src/lib.rs
94:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
95:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

chips/cc26x2/src/crt1.rs
2:use tock_rt0;
89:    tock_rt0::init_data(&mut _etext, &mut _srelocate, &mut _erelocate);
90:    tock_rt0::zero_bss(&mut _szero, &mut _ezero);

I'm actually confused why this compiles. How are those remaining tock_rt0 dependencies being resolved? I also see tock_rt0 in most of the cargo.lock files even after running a top-level make clean and rebuilding boards.

I don't think we can use tock-rt0::init_data, as it would not compile. It has to be tock_rt0::init_data.

[hudson-ayers]

Yep, looks like I misunderstood. Sorry for the confusion.

[ppannuto]

bors r+

[bors]

Build succeeded:

• ci-build (macos-latest)
• ci-build (ubuntu-latest)
• ci-format (macos-latest)
• ci-format (ubuntu-latest)
• ci-tests (macos-latest)
• ci-tests (ubuntu-latest)
• continuous-integration/travis-ci/push
• emulation-check