deprecate launchxl, cc26x2 #1963
Conversation
Moved to tock-archive
|
We also talked about archiving this board during the 1.5 release window, then just didn't get around to actually doing it after the release. |
|
whoops, the benchmarks action fails if you remove a board, because it builds it for current master and then finds nothing to compare it to. It won't block merging though as it is not a required status. |
|
@tock/core-wg |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, it looks like the benchmark fails because it tries to diff a previous board to a removed board AFAIU.
The script could check that both boards exist (in master and the current branch) otherwise ignore it but it doesn't have to be fixed in this PR though.
bradjc
dismissed stale reviews from niklasad1, brghena, alistair23, hudson-ayers, and themself
via
cf3f592
|
bors r+ |
|
I am interested in developing on the CC26xx and CC13xx platform. Are there instruction on getting it work? |
|
There are instructions here, though you will be running an older version of Tock: https://github.com/tock/tock-archive/blob/bcb4e3872dd921ff42b3b8053815e969287d269b/launchxl/README.md . In order to get flashing to work, you will likely need to follow the instructions here: https://github.com/tock/tock-archive/tree/bcb4e3872dd921ff42b3b8053815e969287d269b/launchxl/boards/launchxl |
Pull Request Overview
This pull request deprecates the LaunchXL and CC26x2, moving them to tock-archive.
This is not intended as a statement one way or another on this chip or board, rather just a recognition that this board has not seem much uptake, and maintenance is lagging (e.g. #1101).
See the companion PR here: tock/tock-archive#2
Testing Strategy
Compiling.
TODO or Help Wanted
N/A
Documentation Updated
/docs, or no updates are required.Formatting
make prepush.