build: codesigning dmg

[pengx17]

fix #5898

[graphite-app]

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into canary

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

You can enable merging using labels in your Graphite merge queue settings.

[pengx17]

Current dependencies on/for this PR:

• build: codesigning dmg #5921 👈
• canary

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Description updated to latest commit (dfda752)

• Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 39d177c. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

✅ Successfully ran 6 targets

• nx test:coverage @affine/monorepo
• nx build @affine/native -- --target x86_64-pc-windows-msvc --use-napi-cross
• nx build @affine/storage -- --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --use-napi-cross
• nx build @affine/native -- --target x86_64-apple-darwin --use-napi-cross
• nx build @affine/native -- --target aarch64-apple-darwin --use-napi-cross
• nx build @affine/native -- --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --use-napi-cross

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the PR introduces a single, straightforward change to the GitHub Actions workflow specifically for macOS builds. The change involves adding a step for signing DMG files, which is a common practice for macOS applications. The command used for signing is standard and the conditional check ensures it only runs for macOS builds.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
🔍 Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

---

✨ Review tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs By invoking: /review auto_approve The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions

	Suggestions
security	Extract the developer identity string into a GitHub Actions secret.           Consider extracting the hard-coded developer identity string into a GitHub Actions secret. This approach enhances security by keeping sensitive information out of the public repository and makes it easier to update the developer identity without changing the workflow file. .github/workflows/release-desktop.yml [136] -codesign --force --sign "Developer ID Application: TOEVERYTHING PTE. LTD." packages/frontend/electron/out/${{ env.BUILD_TYPE }}/make/AFFiNE.dmg +codesign --force --sign ${{ secrets.DEVELOPER_IDENTITY }} packages/frontend/electron/out/${{ env.BUILD_TYPE }}/make/AFFiNE.dmg
best practice	Add error handling for the codesign command.                     Add error handling for the codesign command to ensure the workflow fails gracefully if the signing process encounters an issue. This can be achieved by checking the exit status of the codesign command. .github/workflows/release-desktop.yml [136] -codesign --force --sign "Developer ID Application: TOEVERYTHING PTE. LTD." packages/frontend/electron/out/${{ env.BUILD_TYPE }}/make/AFFiNE.dmg +codesign --force --sign "Developer ID Application: TOEVERYTHING PTE. LTD." packages/frontend/electron/out/${{ env.BUILD_TYPE }}/make/AFFiNE.dmg || { echo "Error: codesigning failed"; exit 1; } Add a verification step after signing the DMG file.                           It's a good practice to verify the signature after signing the DMG file to ensure that the signing process was successful. This can be done by adding a verification step immediately after the signing step. .github/workflows/release-desktop.yml [136] -codesign --force --sign "Developer ID Application: TOEVERYTHING PTE. LTD." packages/frontend/electron/out/${{ env.BUILD_TYPE }}/make/AFFiNE.dmg +codesign --verify --verbose packages/frontend/electron/out/${{ env.BUILD_TYPE }}/make/AFFiNE.dmg
maintainability	Use a more descriptive name for the DMG signing step.                         To improve the readability and maintainability of the workflow, consider using a more descriptive name for the signing step. This helps to quickly understand the purpose of each step in the workflow. .github/workflows/release-desktop.yml [133] -- name: signing DMG +- name: Sign DMG for macOS Distribution
enhancement	Add a condition to ensure signing is attempted only on successful macOS builds. To ensure that the signing process is only attempted on macOS builds where it's applicable, consider adding a condition to check not only the platform but also the success of the previous steps. This can prevent attempting to sign in cases where the build might have failed or not produced the expected output. .github/workflows/release-desktop.yml [134] -if: ${{ matrix.spec.platform == 'darwin' }} +if: ${{ matrix.spec.platform == 'darwin' && steps.build.outcome == 'success' }}

---

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

---

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.95%. Comparing base (606397e) to head (39d177c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           canary    #5921   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.95%   63.95%           
=======================================
  Files         364      364           
  Lines       20033    20033           
  Branches     1713     1713           
=======================================
  Hits        12813    12813           
  Misses       7001     7001           
  Partials      219      219           

Flag	Coverage Δ
server-test	71.20% <ø> (ø)
unittest	43.97% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[graphite-app]

Merge activity

• Feb 27, 1:35 AM EST: EYHN added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Feb 27, 1:44 AM EST: EYHN merged this pull request with the Graphite merge queue.