-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rank1 support #48
Rank1 support #48
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #48 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 74.50% 75.80% +1.29%
==========================================
Files 43 43
Lines 2593 2748 +155
==========================================
+ Hits 1932 2083 +151
- Misses 661 665 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few comments but it seems to be going in the right direction.
I would say for a first draft, lets aim to only use get_D
in the worker?
Co-authored-by: Thomas Moreau <thomas.moreau.2010@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some comments
Co-authored-by: Thomas Moreau <thomas.moreau.2010@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems right for the compute_DtD
!! Nice! 👍
Co-authored-by: Thomas Moreau <thomas.moreau.2010@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok I think we are nearly there!
A few extra comments.
Co-authored-by: Thomas Moreau <thomas.moreau.2010@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A small comments on why the test is breaking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tomMoral merge if happy
The example is nice and working! LGTM! thanks @rprimet |
🙏 @rprimet ! |
Very rough draft of part 1 of the implementation of #46 for discussion / comments.