Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"API request error" appears when sendings TONs with a comment more than 70 cyrillic symbols #36

Closed
julialips opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@julialips
Copy link

Bug Type

Functional

Reproduction steps

Precondition: You have positive TON balance.

  1. Open the site https://wallet.ton.org/ and login into your account
  2. Click 'Send' button
  3. Enter a valid TON address into the 'Recipient wallet address' field
  4. Enter a valid TON amount
  5. Enter a text large than 70 cyrillic symbols into the 'Comment (optional)' field (e.g. "Марс — четвёртая по удалённости от Солнца и седьмая по размеру планета Солнечной системы; масса пл")
  6. Click the 'Send TON' button

Actual result

"API request error" appears. The payment is not being sent.
изображение_2022-09-17_004715356

Expected result

Some ways:

  1. The error should not appear. I guess, the comment has a maximum valid length, so a user should know this.
    The field may cut the comment length to the maximum and not allow to enter more. Some symbol counter will be cool.
  2. Local validation, without sending API. If the length is more than maximum, show text error or highlight the field with red line.

Suggested Severity

Medium

Device

  • OS: Windows
  • Browser: Opera
  • Version: 90.0.4480.54

Additional Context

No response

@EmelyanenkoK
Copy link
Member

Wrong repo. This issue will be accounted as if it was posted in https://github.com/toncenter/ton-wallet/issues

@GetRekt69420
Copy link

use google chrome, not brave.. (this fixed the problem with me)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants