Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
sched/fair: Ratelimit update to tg->load_avg
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance
with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times
update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on
a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR):

    13.75%    13.74%  [kernel.vmlinux]           [k] update_cfs_group
    10.63%    10.04%  [kernel.vmlinux]           [k] update_load_avg

Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg
with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being
the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks
of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access
tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended.

E.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus Intel
Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions and
migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's load
will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change involves
an update to tg->load_avg. Since the workload can trigger as many wakeups
and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg can be
unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable
overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse:
during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is
14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%.

Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once
per ms. The update frequency is a tradeoff between tracking accuracy and
overhead. 1ms is chosen because PELT window is roughly 1ms and it
delivered good results for the tests that I've done. After this change,
the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly reduced and performance
improved. Detailed test results below.

  ==============================
  postgres_sysbench on SPR:
  25%
  base:   42382±19.8%
  patch:  50174±9.5%  (noise)

  50%
  base:   67626±1.3%
  patch:  67365±3.1%  (noise)

  75%
  base:   100216±1.2%
  patch:  112470±0.1% +12.2%

  100%
  base:    93671±0.4%
  patch:  113563±0.2% +21.2%

  ==============================
  hackbench on ICL:
  group=1
  base:    114912±5.2%
  patch:   117857±2.5%  (noise)

  group=4
  base:    359902±1.6%
  patch:   361685±2.7%  (noise)

  group=8
  base:    461070±0.8%
  patch:   491713±0.3% +6.6%

  group=16
  base:    309032±5.0%
  patch:   378337±1.3% +22.4%

  =============================
  hackbench on SPR:
  group=1
  base:    100768±2.9%
  patch:   103134±2.9%  (noise)

  group=4
  base:    413830±12.5%
  patch:   378660±16.6% (noise)

  group=8
  base:    436124±0.6%
  patch:   490787±3.2% +12.5%

  group=16
  base:    457730±3.2%
  patch:   680452±1.3% +48.8%

  ============================
  netperf/udp_rr on ICL
  25%
  base:    114413±0.1%
  patch:   115111±0.0% +0.6%

  50%
  base:    86803±0.5%
  patch:   86611±0.0%  (noise)

  75%
  base:    35959±5.3%
  patch:   49801±0.6% +38.5%

  100%
  base:    61951±6.4%
  patch:   70224±0.8% +13.4%

  ===========================
  netperf/udp_rr on SPR
  25%
  base:   104954±1.3%
  patch:  107312±2.8%  (noise)

  50%
  base:    55394±4.6%
  patch:   54940±7.4%  (noise)

  75%
  base:    13779±3.1%
  patch:   36105±1.1% +162%

  100%
  base:     9703±3.7%
  patch:   28011±0.2% +189%

  ==============================================
  netperf/tcp_stream on ICL (all in noise range)
  25%
  base:    43092±0.1%
  patch:   42891±0.5%

  50%
  base:    19278±14.9%
  patch:   22369±7.2%

  75%
  base:    16822±3.0%
  patch:   17086±2.3%

  100%
  base:    18216±0.6%
  patch:   18078±2.9%

  ===============================================
  netperf/tcp_stream on SPR (all in noise range)
  25%
  base:    34491±0.3%
  patch:   34886±0.5%

  50%
  base:    19278±14.9%
  patch:   22369±7.2%

  75%
  base:    16822±3.0%
  patch:   17086±2.3%

  100%
  base:    18216±0.6%
  patch:   18078±2.9%

Reported-by: Nitin Tekchandani <nitin.tekchandani@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Reviewed-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Tested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Tested-by: Swapnil Sapkal <Swapnil.Sapkal@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230912065808.2530-2-aaron.lu@intel.com
  • Loading branch information
aaronlu authored and Ingo Molnar committed Sep 18, 2023
1 parent 8f0eed4 commit 1528c66
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 13 additions and 1 deletion.
13 changes: 12 additions & 1 deletion kernel/sched/fair.c
Expand Up @@ -3876,17 +3876,28 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
*/
static inline void update_tg_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
long delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib;
long delta;
u64 now;

/*
* No need to update load_avg for root_task_group as it is not used.
*/
if (cfs_rq->tg == &root_task_group)
return;

/*
* For migration heavy workloads, access to tg->load_avg can be
* unbound. Limit the update rate to at most once per ms.
*/
now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)));
if (now - cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg < NSEC_PER_MSEC)
return;

delta = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib;
if (abs(delta) > cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib / 64) {
atomic_long_add(delta, &cfs_rq->tg->load_avg);
cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg;
cfs_rq->last_update_tg_load_avg = now;
}
}

Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions kernel/sched/sched.h
Expand Up @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
} removed;

#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
u64 last_update_tg_load_avg;
unsigned long tg_load_avg_contrib;
long propagate;
long prop_runnable_sum;
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 1528c66

Please sign in to comment.