Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Reinstate some of "swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE""
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Halil Pasic points out [1] that the full revert of that commit (revert
in bddac7c), and that a partial revert that only reverts the
problematic case, but still keeps some of the cleanups is probably
better.  

And that partial revert [2] had already been verified by Oleksandr
Natalenko to also fix the issue, I had just missed that in the long
discussion.

So let's reinstate the cleanups from commit aa6f8dc ("swiotlb:
rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE""), and effectively only
revert the part that caused problems.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220328013731.017ae3e3.pasic@linux.ibm.com/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220324055732.GB12078@lst.de/ [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4386660.LvFx2qVVIh@natalenko.name/ [3]
Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
  • Loading branch information
torvalds committed Mar 28, 2022
1 parent ae085d7 commit 901c728
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 8 additions and 20 deletions.
8 changes: 0 additions & 8 deletions Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst
Expand Up @@ -130,11 +130,3 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged
subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege
level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the
lesser-privileged levels).

DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE
------------------

This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to
overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the
previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering
implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers.
8 changes: 0 additions & 8 deletions include/linux/dma-mapping.h
Expand Up @@ -61,14 +61,6 @@
*/
#define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9)

/*
* This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected
* to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any
* of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows
* bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers.
*/
#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10)

/*
* A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can
* be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a
Expand Down
12 changes: 8 additions & 4 deletions kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
Expand Up @@ -627,10 +627,14 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++)
mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i);
tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset;
if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
(!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE ||
dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
/*
* When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig
* to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will
* overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus
* unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e.
* kernel memory) to user-space.
*/
swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
return tlb_addr;
}

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 901c728

Please sign in to comment.