Wrapped monospacing around example progress bar

[CrazyPython]

Looks better, more accurate representation of progress bar.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 81.404% when pulling 7e118d2 on CrazyPython:CrazyPython-patch-1 into edefb05 on tqdm:master.

[codecov-io]

Current coverage is 81.40% (diff: 100%)

Merging #205 into master will not change coverage

@@             master       #205   diff @@
==========================================
  Files             8          8          
  Lines           527        527          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches         99         99          
==========================================
  Hits            429        429          
  Misses           98         98          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update edefb05...63e3d2a

[lrq3000]

Thank's for the better formatting. We should then also remove the escapes because they aren't necessary anymore:

76%\|████████████████████\ \| 7641/10000 [00:34<00:10, 222.22 it/s]

[CrazyPython]

@lrq3000 boom! glad to help you out!

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 81.404% when pulling 63e3d2a on CrazyPython:CrazyPython-patch-1 into edefb05 on tqdm:master.

[casperdcl]

? does this work? I was sure in the past either github or pypi condensed spaces even in mono...

[CrazyPython]

@casperdcl huh?

[CrazyPython]

@casperdcl why hasn't codecov/changes finished building yet? :/

[CrazyPython]

Do the same in PyPI.

[CrazyPython]

@casperdcl why hasn't codecov completed yet? I think it's bugged. you should restart it and/or disable the requiredness of codecov. I don't think code coverage should ever block a PR.

[casperdcl]

merged in #212

[casperdcl]

I recall we added two different coverage methods because different people were comfortable with different ones. In the past I've also noticed interesting differences between the stats reported. each seems to have its advantages. just tried resetting the codecov hook. we'll see