define generics in doc comment for type Wgpu

[bionicles]

I didn't know what these meant, others will likely face a similar question, this can save some others some hunting around and make it more intuitive to work with wgpu

Pull Request Template

Checklist

• Confirmed that run-checks all script has been executed.
• Made sure the book is up to date with changes in this PR.

Related Issues/PRs

Provide links to relevant issues and dependent PRs.

Changes

Summarize the problem being addressed and your solution.

Testing

Describe how these changes have been tested.

[nathanielsimard]

The documentation is duplicated for now when fusion is enabled, could you also add those comments on top declaration when fusion isn't enabled?

Thanks

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.07%. Comparing base (8bf1cd6) to head (ea1ffc3).
Report is 75 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1804   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.07%   86.07%           
=======================================
  Files         781      781           
  Lines       91616    91616           
=======================================
  Hits        78861    78861           
  Misses      12755    12755           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bionicles]

hmm, i'm not sure what you mean by fusion, could you please post a picture of what you're talking about so i can try to reproduce that? @nathanielsimard

[nathanielsimard]

@bionicles

The are two different pub type Wgpu with different feature flags.

[bionicles]

@nathanielsimard hey, i'm sorry that brief fix took so long, I was working on other things and this fell to the 2nd page of github notifications. GitHub Workspaces enabled me to go to the patch i made before and fix what you wanted, so please let me know if that's good, just a minor doc comments improvement and your feedback was on point

[github-actions]

This PR has been marked as stale because it has not been updated for over a month

[nathanielsimard]

The generic arguments are gone, so the comments would not be very useful 😅

[bionicles]

no problemo, thanks for informing me