Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify storing renewed acme certificate #2614

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 27, 2017

Conversation

ferhatelmas
Copy link
Contributor

@ferhatelmas ferhatelmas commented Dec 22, 2017

What does this PR do?

Simplification in storing renewed certificate in acme certificate renewal.

Motivation

Not to mislead readers.

Additional Notes

Account argument was passed but it was actually accessed through store and there was no need to pass it so dropped that argument.

Copy link
Contributor

@nmengin nmengin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well seen @ferhatelmas !

LGTM 👏

@nmengin nmengin added kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. and removed status/0-needs-triage labels Dec 22, 2017
@nmengin nmengin added this to the 1.6 milestone Dec 22, 2017
Copy link
Member

@mmatur mmatur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ldez ldez changed the title refactor: simplify storing renewed acme certificate Simplify storing renewed acme certificate Dec 26, 2017
Copy link
Member

@juliens juliens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Account argument was passed but it was actually
accessed through store and there was no need to
pass it so dropped that argument.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/acme kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants