Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

error pages: do not buffer response when it's not an error #5285

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2019

Conversation

mpl
Copy link
Collaborator

@mpl mpl commented Sep 3, 2019

What does this PR do?

This PR fixes the error pages middleware, so that it does not buffer responses anymore.

As it was, the error pages middleware was using a response writer, to intercept the response coming from the backend, analyse the code in the response, so that it would know the error pages handler should take over and be in charge of writing the error response.
The problem is, it was keeping the response's body in memory so that, when the backend does not reply with an error, we could reconstruct the original response and forward it to the client. Which means, with large enough responses, it would result in large memory footprints.

This PR adds a new response writer (codeCatcher), that analyses the code in the response as soon as possible, without buffering the response's body. Then, if the code is among the one's we're handling, it drops the contents of the response, because the actual newResponseRecorder is going to reissue the request to the backend anyway, and record the response again. Otherwise, it forwards the response directly to the original client, without any buffering having occurred.

Motivation

Fixing #4474

More

  • [ ] Added/updated tests
  • [ ] Added/updated documentation

Additional Notes

Fixes #4474

@dtomcej
Copy link
Contributor

dtomcej commented Sep 11, 2019

giphy

Copy link
Contributor

@dtomcej dtomcej left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
:shipit:

Copy link
Member

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@juliens juliens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants