-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 337
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
interp: do not wrap empty interface #1017
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jan 26, 2021
soulbalz
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2021
soulbalz
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2021
mvertes
requested changes
Feb 2, 2021
mvertes
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
mvertes
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2021
This is a follow-up of #1017, generalizing the use of reflect.Set method to set, and possibly overwrite, the concrete value of interface objects all accross the implementation of operators.
traefiker
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2021
This is a follow-up of #1017, generalizing the use of reflect.Set method to set, and possibly overwrite, the concrete value of interface objects all accross the implementation of operators. Previous optimized implementation for non-interface objects is preserved.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The empty interface (interface{}), and its variants (such as []interface{} and map[string]interface{}), are commonly used in Go to (json) Unmarshal arbitrary data. Within Yaegi, all interface types are wrapped in a valueInterface struct in order to retain all the information needed for a consistent internal state (as reflect is not enough to achieve that). However, this wrapping ends up being problematic when it comes to the type assertions related to the aforementioned Unmarshaling.
Therefore, this PR is an attempt to consider the empty interface (and its variants) as an exception within Yaegi, that should never be wrapped within a valueInterface, and to treat it similarly to the other basic Go types. The assumption is that the wrapping should not be needed, as there is no information about implemented methods to maintain.
Fixes #984
Fixes #829
Fixes #1015