Webhooks use profile.identifier #10
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
In the current state this profile is embedded in @bencmbrook what do you think?
|
bencmbrook
approved these changes
Sep 29, 2020
delete-merged-branch
bot
deleted the
michaelfarrell76/updates-to-use-profile
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Noticed that the examples were all assuming that the servers were looking up by the core identifier. This changes updates the examples to allow for webhooks to respond to arbitrary identifier types.
Take the following workflow:
In this case the profileId should be the username, not the core identifier/email.
Updated Receiving DSR docs
Updated Upload to our API docs