New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add s3 --host_prefix #1083
add s3 --host_prefix #1083
Conversation
From |
@mfrancis95 yes, but if you put |
Just tested it. It looks like it's still trying to deploy to |
@mfrancis95 i now think that the option we want might be i have tested this with a local ruby script, and it has output the expected endpoint, keeping the bucket name on the path:
in order to keep this consistent with S3's terminology i have renamed the option on our side, too. so you now want to pass: deploy:
provider: s3
force_path_style: true
edge:
branch: sf-s3-subdomain wanna give this a try? |
@svenfuchs that worked! Thank you. This should make the Travis S3 deployment a lot more compatible with S3 gateways out there. |
b0cd8eb
to
47274ec
Compare
Thanks @svenfuchs. Approximately how long will it take for this change to go live on travis-ci.com? |
@mfrancis95 we'll release the gem as a preview release today or tomorrow, but that will mean you still need to opt in via there's no timeline on releasing a stable version ... we'll first want to see what kind of issues come up. |
@svenfuchs I opted in after seeing this post: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2019-08-27-deployment-tooling-dpl-v2-preview-release But I got this issue:
|
woha. thanks for the report @mfrancis95 i've just pushed a change that should fix this. |
Thanks @svenfuchs. It works! |
refers to #1079
can be tested with