Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed a typo (IRC notifications -> webhook payloads). #46

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 27, 2012
Merged

Fixed a typo (IRC notifications -> webhook payloads). #46

merged 1 commit into from Feb 27, 2012

Conversation

SamWhited
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed a quick Copy/Paste related typo in the documentation (webhook payloads != IRC notifications).

parndt added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2012
Fixed a typo (IRC notifications -> webhook payloads).
@parndt parndt merged commit f778d0a into travis-ci:master Feb 27, 2012
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Contributor

@parndt please check that Markdown source is updated before merging

@michaelklishin
Copy link
Contributor

@SamWhited you did not update Markdown sources. Next time someone regenerates the entire site, your changes will be lost. Please follow steps in the README.

@parndt
Copy link
Contributor

parndt commented Feb 27, 2012

@michaelklishin Maybe the html docs shouldn't be in git if they're built dynamically from Markdown ? :/

@michaelklishin
Copy link
Contributor

This will only work for sites that use Jekyll. We don't.

@SamWhited
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, yah, that makes a lot more sense. Sorry about that.

parndt added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2012
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Contributor

I am all for not having HTML under version control if we can keep using nanoc and not break existing URLs. After talking to several people and supporting several static documentation sites for several months (using nanoc), I still don't know how to do it with github pages.

@parndt
Copy link
Contributor

parndt commented Feb 27, 2012

What if we used another repo that used a commit hook to generate the docs and push the resulting HTML to this repo?

@michaelklishin
Copy link
Contributor

I am thinking maybe we can make github pages believe our site is jekyll by having a rakefile and maybe directory structure that mimics Jekyll. However, we absolutely cannot break existing URLs.

@SamWhited
Copy link
Contributor Author

Proper fix: #47

(I tried attaching it here, but hub was giving me issues.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants