Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

apt-get says "Unable to locate package sshpass" #5252

Closed
aschempp opened this issue Dec 8, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

apt-get says "Unable to locate package sshpass" #5252

aschempp opened this issue Dec 8, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@aschempp
Copy link

aschempp commented Dec 8, 2015

On the old infrastructure I used sshpass to connect to a remote server. sshpass was installed using sudo apt-get install sshpass, which seems to no longer work.

See https://travis-ci.org/contao/docs/builds/95556803 for the build log.

PS: I know about the bad practice of sshpass, I just could not come up with anything better as I can't install a certificate on the server …

@meatballhat meatballhat changed the title [precise-gce] apt-get says "Unable to locate package sshpass" apt-get says "Unable to locate package sshpass" Dec 8, 2015
@meatballhat
Copy link

@aschempp The latest images should ship with the cached apt lists in place, meaning you won't necessarily have to apt-get update first. Is this still happening for you?

@BanzaiMan
Copy link
Contributor

@aschempp Please follow up on #5221.

@aschempp
Copy link
Author

aschempp commented Dec 9, 2015

Re-running the job did not fix it, but adding sudo apt-get update does 👍

aschempp added a commit to contao/docs-archive that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2015
kevcunnane pushed a commit to microsoft/vscode-mssql that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2017
- Investigating similar issues causing failure to find apt-get packages led to travis-ci/travis-ci#5252. The solution may be to run apt-get update first.
kevcunnane added a commit to microsoft/vscode-mssql that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2017
* Upgrade and fix most tests
- Upgrade to .Net Core 2.0 in SqlToolsService
- Upgraded TypeMoq to fix multiple tests

* Fix tests broken due to TypeMoq update
- Loose vs Strict mode behavior has changed. Given we initially added strict mode to catch regressions and these are now very stable parts of the code, it seems fine to use Loose mocking and allow the passthroughs to be used.
- Other change was due to assert.equal changing. Before it would return true on deep object equality but it no longer seems to work. Added clear property-level validation in some cases to fix this.

* Fixed issue running test from cmdline locally

* Fix for AppVeyor test fail issue
- This is caused by microsoft/vscode-extension-vscode#64 and will be fixed in the 1.14 release of VSCode

* Attempt to fix travis build without using deprecated group value
- Investigating similar issues causing failure to find apt-get packages led to travis-ci/travis-ci#5252. The solution may be to run apt-get update first.
JeffUlan added a commit to JeffUlan/vscode-mssql that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2023
* Upgrade and fix most tests
- Upgrade to .Net Core 2.0 in SqlToolsService
- Upgraded TypeMoq to fix multiple tests

* Fix tests broken due to TypeMoq update
- Loose vs Strict mode behavior has changed. Given we initially added strict mode to catch regressions and these are now very stable parts of the code, it seems fine to use Loose mocking and allow the passthroughs to be used.
- Other change was due to assert.equal changing. Before it would return true on deep object equality but it no longer seems to work. Added clear property-level validation in some cases to fix this.

* Fixed issue running test from cmdline locally

* Fix for AppVeyor test fail issue
- This is caused by microsoft/vscode-extension-vscode#64 and will be fixed in the 1.14 release of VSCode

* Attempt to fix travis build without using deprecated group value
- Investigating similar issues causing failure to find apt-get packages led to travis-ci/travis-ci#5252. The solution may be to run apt-get update first.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants