Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Update]Fix missing greater_is_better decision when choosing the best program #40

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

eggachecat
Copy link
Contributor

@eggachecat eggachecat commented Jul 20, 2017

Fix missing greater_is_better decision when choosing the best program

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 99.199% when pulling ee31023 on eggachecat:master into 946051d on trevorstephens:master.

@trevorstephens
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the PR @eggachecat ... Can you expand this PR to cover both issues outlined in #42 ? Also some regression tests would be excellent. Doesn't have to be extensive, just a short (smallish population, few generations) to ensure the best programs make it to the "solution(s)"

@eggachecat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@trevorstephens okay! I'll do it!

@trevorstephens
Copy link
Owner

Awesome, thanks!

@eggachecat eggachecat changed the title Fix missing greater_is_better decision when choosing the best program [Update]Fix missing greater_is_better decision when choosing the best program Aug 3, 2017
@@ -479,7 +479,11 @@ def fit(self, X, y, sample_weight=None):
if isinstance(self, TransformerMixin):
# Find the best individuals in the final generation
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this will completely allow all kinds of customized metrics ( e.g. selecting models other than correlation approach), since the content below written in hard code is based on correlation ..

@eggachecat
Copy link
Contributor Author

eggachecat commented Aug 3, 2017

clearly something went wrong..I will reopen a PR with my branch

@eggachecat eggachecat closed this Aug 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants