Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 5, 2019. It is now read-only.

Added code to make trezor-agent work with keepkey. #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 10, 2016
Merged

Added code to make trezor-agent work with keepkey. #49

merged 1 commit into from Feb 10, 2016

Conversation

bgok
Copy link
Contributor

@bgok bgok commented Jan 7, 2016

Would you be interested in taking this pull request? It is needed to make Roman's trezor-agent work for keepkey with minimal changes.

Thanks.

@prusnak prusnak force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from fe459ea to c7c09a7 Compare February 9, 2016 18:21
prusnak added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2016
Added code to make trezor-agent work with keepkey.
@prusnak prusnak merged commit f1868b7 into trezor:master Feb 10, 2016
@prusnak
Copy link
Member

prusnak commented Feb 10, 2016

Thanks!

@dstanchfield
Copy link

Anyway we can get this support for KeepKey removed. This will cause problems with our electrum plugin.

prusnak added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2016
@prusnak
Copy link
Member

prusnak commented Feb 12, 2016

Reverted in 8b7e605.

@dstanchfield
Copy link

Thanks!

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm, maybe I should hard-code the device IDs in Electrum and not import them from the library headers?

@prusnak
Copy link
Member

prusnak commented Feb 27, 2016

Best would be, of course, to create one plugin that would handle both devices. Keepkey's code is just same as TREZOR code with replaced strings anyway.

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Contributor

It's not the same actually.

The plugin code is 99% shared in Electrum.

Now if you two could agree on a common single library, that would be the most helpful. I could then indeed eliminate the plugin separation in Electrum, but not until then.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants