Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

origin #12

Closed
peterdesmet opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

origin #12

peterdesmet opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

Valid values for this dataset are:

  • vagrant for D/N = Cas.
  • introduced for D/N = Nat. or Inv.

As this is a simple mapping, the column origin should be removed from the spreadsheet

@qgroom
Copy link
Collaborator

qgroom commented Jul 7, 2017

done

@qgroom qgroom closed this as completed Jul 7, 2017
@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

I'm reopening this so I don't forget I should map this.

Also, how should question marks be treated?

@peterdesmet peterdesmet reopened this Jul 7, 2017
@qgroom
Copy link
Collaborator

qgroom commented Jul 7, 2017

no problem, Nat? = introduced; Cas.? = vagrant

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

Mapping done but there are also Ext. and Inv. values that are currently left blank.

Also, I think I better include this mapping in the description, as it is not a term yet.

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

Updated to include this in the description extension. To resolve: mapping of Ext. and Inv.

@LienReyserhove
Copy link
Contributor

LienReyserhove commented Mar 7, 2018

We decided to discard origin and to replace it by invasion stage (see #60 (comment)):

The information needed for invasion stage is contained in D/N (degree of naturalisation) in the raw data file (see table for the terms). This information can perfectly be mapped to the Blackburn et al. (2011) vocabulary. This field is currently used for the mapping of origin in the description extension (see #12). I would discard the term origin and replace it by invasion stage

We all agreed on this, so I'm closing this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants