Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch (back) to Einfeldt wave-speed estimate from paper #1751

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 24, 2023

Conversation

DanielDoehring
Copy link
Contributor

@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring commented Nov 21, 2023

Due to the breaking change in #1708
the wave speed estimate now being used ("true" naive) in the 1D HLLC flux for MHD is actually not the desired one (Einfeldt).
This change takes care of this.

@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 21, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

  • The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
  • All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
  • No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

  • The code can be understood easily.
  • Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
  • There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
  • There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
  • The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

  • New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
  • Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
  • Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
  • Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
  • If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md.

Testing

  • The PR passes all tests.
  • New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
  • New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

  • There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
  • If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

  • The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
  • If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results
    are posted in the PR.

Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community.

Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (12b0839) 93.53% compared to head (4419f3f) 93.53%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1751   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.53%   93.53%           
=======================================
  Files         431      431           
  Lines       34853    34853           
=======================================
  Hits        32598    32598           
  Misses       2255     2255           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 93.53% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@andrewwinters5000 andrewwinters5000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented Nov 24, 2023

Downstream CI fails due to JuliaVTK/ReadVTK.jl#49. I'll merge this PR

@ranocha ranocha merged commit 5c08cf4 into trixi-framework:main Nov 24, 2023
33 of 34 checks passed
@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring deleted the HLLC_1D_MHD_Einfeldt branch November 24, 2023 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants