-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update tru virtual docs #949
Conversation
Check out this pull request on聽 See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
馃憤 Looks good to me!
- Reviewed the entire pull request up to 6db49cd
- Looked at
187
lines of code in3
files - Took 1 minute and 3 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
1
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. trulens_eval/trulens_eval/tru_virtual.py:37
:
- Assessed confidence :
0%
- Comment:
The added documentation and changes in this file are clear and well implemented. Good job on removing the artificial delay and replacing it with a small timedelta addition to ensure non-zero duration. - Reasoning:
The PR author has added extensive documentation to the tru_virtual.py file, which is a good practice. The changes in the Evaluations.py file seem to handle the case when the app_component_json is not a dictionary, which is a good error handling practice. The removal of the artificial delay in the VirtualRecord class and its replacement with a small timedelta addition to ensure non-zero duration is a good performance improvement. Overall, the changes seem to be well thought out and correctly implemented.
Workflow ID: wflow_hz4KqULXqOjrPzjf
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
馃憤 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on e2a2baa
- Looked at
41
lines of code in1
files - Took 1 minute and 14 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. trulens_eval/trulens_eval/tru_virtual.py:207
:
- Assessed confidence :
33%
- Comment:
Consider using a constant for the small timedelta value (1 microsecond) that is added to ensure non-zero duration. This would make the code more maintainable and the purpose of this value clearer.
NON_ZERO_DURATION = datetime.timedelta(microseconds=1)
if (subend_time - substart_time).total_seconds() == 0.0:
subend_time += NON_ZERO_DURATION
- Reasoning:
The changes in this PR seem to be primarily focused on improving the performance of the VirtualRecord class by removing an artificial delay and adding a small timedelta only when necessary. This is a good change as it can potentially improve the performance of the application. The changes also include improved documentation and a bug fix in the dashboard. The code changes seem to be logically correct and do not appear to introduce any new bugs. However, I would like to suggest a minor improvement.
Workflow ID: wflow_XUFoDuGRyhHMZ0eW
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
Skipped PR review on 0804bdc because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please contact us and we'll fix it right away. Generated with 鉂わ笍 by ellipsis.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
馃憤 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on 99c92ff
- Looked at
12
lines of code in1
files - Took 41 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. trulens_eval/trulens_eval/tru_virtual.py:11
:
- Assessed confidence :
0%
- Comment:
Good job on removing the unused 'time' import. This helps to keep the code clean and efficient. - Reasoning:
The import of the 'time' module has been removed, but there is no usage of it in the code. This is a good practice to remove unused imports as it can improve the performance of the code and make it cleaner.
Workflow ID: wflow_jPn16bKsoqtt8ZEw
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
馃憤 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on 8826a03
- Looked at
202
lines of code in3
files - Took 1 minute and 59 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
1
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. trulens_eval/trulens_eval/tru_virtual.py:140
:
- Assessed confidence :
0%
- Comment:
Great job on enhancing the documentation forVirtualRecord
and other parts oftru_virtual.py
. This will make the code more understandable and maintainable. Also, good work on optimizing the virtual record construction process by removing an artificial delay and adding a small timedelta if needed to makePerf
span represent non-zero duration. This will improve the performance of the virtual record construction process. - Reasoning:
The PR author has added more documentation for VirtualRecord and some other parts of tru_virtual.py to make it clearer how to set various fields and what the defaults are if not set. This is a good practice as it makes the code more understandable and maintainable. The author has also fixed a bug in the dashboard when displaying components that are JSON base types. This is a good fix as it prevents potential errors and improves the user experience. The author has updated the virtual records example notebook to fix outdated usage. This is a good update as it ensures that the example notebook is up-to-date and can be used as a reliable reference. The author has removed an artificial delay in virtual record construction and replaced it with the addition of a small timedelta if needed to make Perf span represent non-zero duration which causes some dashboard issues otherwise. This is a good optimization as it improves the performance of the virtual record construction process.
Workflow ID: wflow_tyvzqNUur5PIJFFA
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
Summary:
This PR enhances the documentation for
tru_virtual.py
, fixes a dashboard bug related to JSON base types, updates the virtual records example notebook, and optimizes the virtual record construction process.Key points:
VirtualRecord
and other parts oftru_virtual.py
.Perf
span represent non-zero duration.Generated with 鉂わ笍 by ellipsis.dev