-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix release test pipeline #962
Conversation
Check out this pull request on聽 See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
馃憤 Looks good to me!
- Reviewed the entire pull request up to f816c40
- Looked at
10
lines of code in1
files - Took 39 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
4
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. docs/trulens_eval/getting_started/quickstarts/index.md:15
:
- Assessed confidence :
50%
- Comment:
Please ensure that thetrulens_eval/prototype_evals.ipynb
notebook exists and is relevant to this section. - Reasoning:
The PR author has added a new notebook to the list of quickstart notebooks. I need to check if this notebook actually exists in the codebase and if it's relevant to the section.
Workflow ID: wflow_nZFvTULESFIruDQw
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
馃憤 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on e9f3212
- Looked at
2084
lines of code in5
files - Took 3 minutes and 31 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
Workflow ID: wflow_MxzQwOa7w3eA9fk5
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
e9f3212
to
f816c40
Compare
287886a
to
75f2f87
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
馃憤 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on 75f2f87
- Looked at
1407
lines of code in1
files - Took 2 minutes and 33 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. trulens_eval/generated_files/all_tools.py:1
:
- Assessed confidence :
100%
- Grade:
0%
- Comment:
Consider splitting this script into multiple scripts for better maintainability and readability. Also, avoid hard-coding API keys in the code. Use a secure method to store and access API keys. - Reasoning:
The script is very long and contains multiple sections. It would be better to split it into multiple scripts for better maintainability and readability. Also, the script contains hard-coded API keys which is a security issue. API keys should be stored securely and not exposed in the code.
Workflow ID: wflow_MfZ44SFqxvt0j2yI
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary:
This PR updates the
index.md
file, adds a newall_tools.py
file with quickstart guides, removes several Python scripts, and adds a new quickstart notebook toindex.md
.Key points:
index.md
to include new quickstart notebooks.all_tools.py
undertrulens_eval/generated_files/
with quickstart guides for TruLens library.trulens_eval/examples/quickstart/py_script_quickstarts/
.trulens_eval/prototype_evals.ipynb
toindex.md
.Generated with 鉂わ笍 by ellipsis.dev