This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 5, 2024. It is now read-only.
Ack addtnl form of interop that's important: with legacy tech #11
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>
andorsk
added
type: content
andorsk
added
the
status: unassigned
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>
|
Merge conflicts resolved. |
|
Thanks @dhh1128 ! |
andorsk
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2022
wenjing
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2022
|
Merged based on TechArch discussion Nov 3. |
talltree
reviewed
Nov 4, 2022
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hardman daniel.hardman@gmail.com
This replaces a comment I left in the google doc version of the spec, before I noticed @talltree 's comment that it was frozen and the content should be managed here in Github.
BTW, I have some open comments from section 6 in that same document. There is no comment from Drummond indicating that that section is locked. But I can submit a PR with those comments, if this is the canonical place for that section as well. What do you advise?