Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds support for Send API enhanced features #31

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2022
Merged

Adds support for Send API enhanced features #31

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2022

Conversation

tk26
Copy link
Contributor

@tk26 tk26 commented Feb 2, 2022

Description of the change

Adds support to use enhanced send features

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Related issues

Fix #1

Checklists

Development

  • Lint rules pass locally
  • The code changed/added as part of this pull request has been covered with tests
  • All tests related to the changed code pass in development

Code review

  • This pull request has a descriptive title and information useful to a reviewer. There may be a screenshot or screencast attached
  • "Ready for review" label attached to the PR and reviewers mentioned in a comment
  • Changes have been reviewed by at least one other engineer
  • Issue from task tracker has a link to this pull request

@tk26 tk26 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 2, 2022
@tk26 tk26 self-assigned this Feb 2, 2022
$message = (object) [];
$response = $this->getCourierClient()->sendEnhancedNotification($message, "idempotent");

$this->assertEquals("POST", $response->method);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it would be nice to have a check to make sure buildIdempotentRequest was called and not buildRequest.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would rather move fast on this change over super exhaustive testing of a deeper if condition. that being said if we know a quick way to spy and test it happy to add that but didn't think it was necessary

@tk26 tk26 merged commit 84a573f into main Feb 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants