New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TE packet bandwidth #116
Comments
2020-12-18 TEAS Call Discussion about how to represent TE packet bandwidth (in Mbps, Gbps) Option 1:
Option 2: cir string (with a pattern) Option 3:
Agreement for Option 2 @tsaad-dev : propose the pattern A pattern using scientific notation seems preferable to enable comparisons, as per https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-6.4:
|
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-6.4 references IEEE 754 which is "IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic". I am not sure this definition actually supports scientific notation. |
Sample type: Sample leaf: |
Added bandwidth-scientific-notation types as per discussion in tsaad-dev#116
Move common packet types from MPLS-TE type to Packet TE types (updating RFC8776) Added bandwidth-scientific-notation types as per discussion in #116 Move TE packet bandwidth augmentations from MPLS-TE Topology to Packet TE Topology Uploaded draft (md, txt and xml) for the MPLS-TE Topology model (draft-busizheng-teas-yang-te-mpls-topology-01)
TE packet bandwidth augmentations in ietf-te-mpls-topology can be moved to te-topology-packet since they are not specific for MPLS but also applicable to other packet technologies (e.g., ETH).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: