2487 graphql v1v2 endpoints does not work

[Romakita]

Information

Closes: #2487

Type	Breaking change
Feature	No

---

Todos

• Tests
• Coverage
• Example
• Documentation

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 2 vCPUs | 6.8GB Mem
• Node: v16.20.2
• Run: Wed Nov 01 2023 09:48:13 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
fastify	3.29.4	✓	45865.6	21.36	8.18
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	40121.6	24.49	7.15
koa	2.13.4	✗	35388.0	27.81	6.31
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	22910.8	43.04	5.22
express	4.18.1	✓	8842.2	112.32	1.58
tsed-koa	7.41.2	✓	7834.2	126.76	6.84
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	7608.0	130.53	87.53
nest	8.4.3	✓	7592.4	130.52	1.82
express-injector	4.18.1	✗	7031.5	141.00	1.60
tsed-express	7.41.2	✓	6436.6	153.92	1.18
express-morgan	4.18.1	✗	5000.6	198.00	0.89

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 2 vCPUs | 6.8GB Mem
• Node: v16.20.2
• Run: Wed Nov 01 2023 10:16:09 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
fastify	3.29.4	✓	54985.6	17.76	9.81
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	49222.4	19.86	8.78
koa	2.13.4	✗	41500.8	23.60	7.40
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	27976.0	35.29	6.38
express	4.18.1	✓	11093.6	89.38	1.98
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	10256.0	96.71	117.99
tsed-koa	7.41.2	✓	10103.5	98.14	8.83
nest	8.4.3	✓	9961.0	99.59	2.39
express-injector	4.18.1	✗	9056.5	109.46	2.06
tsed-express	7.41.2	✓	8423.4	117.73	1.54
express-morgan	4.18.1	✗	6663.1	148.74	1.19

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 2 vCPUs | 6.8GB Mem
• Node: v16.20.2
• Run: Wed Nov 01 2023 10:31:07 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
fastify	3.29.4	✓	42224.0	23.22	7.53
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	37589.6	26.19	6.70
koa	2.13.4	✗	31954.4	30.87	5.70
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	21586.0	45.90	4.92
express	4.18.1	✓	8261.8	120.09	1.47
tsed-koa	7.41.2	✓	7529.1	131.53	6.58
nest	8.4.3	✓	7054.0	140.54	1.70
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	7007.6	141.51	80.61
express-injector	4.18.1	✗	6710.4	147.77	1.53
tsed-express	7.41.2	✓	5764.4	171.85	1.06
express-morgan	4.18.1	✗	4727.1	209.39	0.84

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 2 vCPUs | 6.8GB Mem
• Node: v16.20.2
• Run: Wed Nov 01 2023 11:42:23 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
fastify	3.29.4	✓	57974.4	16.80	10.34
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	50435.2	19.34	8.99
koa	2.13.4	✗	43846.4	22.32	7.82
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	29731.2	33.16	6.78
express	4.18.1	✓	11463.2	86.60	2.04
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	10560.0	93.84	121.47
tsed-koa	7.41.2	✓	10350.0	95.76	9.04
nest	8.4.3	✓	10274.0	96.54	2.47
express-injector	4.18.1	✗	9383.8	105.70	2.14
tsed-express	7.41.2	✓	8552.2	115.87	1.57
express-morgan	4.18.1	✗	6879.1	144.03	1.23

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[Romakita]

🎉 This PR is included in version 7.42.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• v7.42.0
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀