Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lxqt-archiver vs. Arqiver? #23

Closed
probonopd opened this issue Mar 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

lxqt-archiver vs. Arqiver? #23

probonopd opened this issue Mar 20, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@probonopd
Copy link

Are

somehow related? Are both under active development, are there any philosophical differences between the two?
Which one would you recommend us to ship in helloSystem?

@tsujan
Copy link
Owner

tsujan commented Mar 20, 2021

lxqt-archiver belongs to LXQt and is a Qt fork of engrampa — its core code is based on GLib and it uses libfm-qt — while Arqiver is an DE-independent, Qt-based front-end for bsdtar (as it's called in Linux), 7z and gzip. They're both under active development: lxqt-archiver by the LXQt team (me included) and Arqiver by me.

Their main difference is that lxqt-archiver uses GLib to handle the command-line options of its backends, while Arqiver does it by using Qt. Because of that, Arqiver has a much more compact code.

@tsujan tsujan closed this as completed Mar 20, 2021
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 20, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants