fix types

Fixes a merge timing conflict between
elastic@e27066d
and elastic@b4b316a

x-pack/test/security_solution_api_integration/test_suites/detections_response/rules_management/rule_bulk_actions/trial_license_complete_tier/perform_bulk_action.ts

@@ -1175,22 +1175,22 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => {
             })
             .expect(200);
 
-          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.summary).to.eql({
+          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.summary).toEqual({
             failed: 0,
             skipped: 0,
             succeeded: 1,
             total: 1,
           });
 
           // Check that the updated rule is returned with the response
-          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.results.updated[0].investigation_fields).to.eql({
+          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.results.updated[0].investigation_fields).toEqual({
             field_names: ['field-1'],
           });
 
           // Check that the updates have been persisted
           const { body: updatedRule } = await fetchRule(ruleId).expect(200);
 
-          expect(updatedRule.investigation_fields).to.eql({ field_names: ['field-1'] });
+          expect(updatedRule.investigation_fields).toEqual({ field_names: ['field-1'] });
         });
 
         it('should add investigation fields to rules', async () => {
@@ -1218,22 +1218,22 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => {
             })
             .expect(200);
 
-          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.summary).to.eql({
+          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.summary).toEqual({
             failed: 0,
             skipped: 0,
             succeeded: 1,
             total: 1,
           });
 
           // Check that the updated rule is returned with the response
-          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.results.updated[0].investigation_fields).to.eql(
+          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.results.updated[0].investigation_fields).toEqual(
             resultingFields
           );
 
           // Check that the updates have been persisted
           const { body: updatedRule } = await fetchRule(ruleId).expect(200);
 
-          expect(updatedRule.investigation_fields).to.eql(resultingFields);
+          expect(updatedRule.investigation_fields).toEqual(resultingFields);
         });
 
         it('should delete investigation fields from rules', async () => {
@@ -1261,22 +1261,22 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => {
             })
             .expect(200);
 
-          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.summary).to.eql({
+          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.summary).toEqual({
             failed: 0,
             skipped: 0,
             succeeded: 1,
             total: 1,
           });
 
           // Check that the updated rule is returned with the response
-          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.results.updated[0].investigation_fields).to.eql(
+          expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.results.updated[0].investigation_fields).toEqual(
             resultingFields
           );
 
           // Check that the updates have been persisted
           const { body: updatedRule } = await fetchRule(ruleId).expect(200);
 
-          expect(updatedRule.investigation_fields).to.eql(resultingFields);
+          expect(updatedRule.investigation_fields).toEqual(resultingFields);
         });
 
         const skipIndexPatternsUpdateCases = [
@@ -1337,22 +1337,22 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => {
                 })
                 .expect(200);
 
-              expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.summary).to.eql({
+              expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.summary).toEqual({
                 failed: 0,
                 skipped: 1,
                 succeeded: 0,
                 total: 1,
               });
 
               // Check that the rules is returned as skipped with expected skip reason
-              expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.results.skipped[0].skip_reason).to.eql(
+              expect(bulkEditResponse.attributes.results.skipped[0].skip_reason).toEqual(
                 'RULE_NOT_MODIFIED'
               );
 
               // Check that the no changes have been persisted
               const { body: updatedRule } = await fetchRule(ruleId).expect(200);
 
-              expect(updatedRule.investigation_fields).to.eql(resultingInvestigationFields);
+              expect(updatedRule.investigation_fields).toEqual(resultingInvestigationFields);
             });
           }
         );