Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MarshalJSON should produce unique result ID #589

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

MikhailChe
Copy link
Contributor

Result variable inside for-loop actually have the same address on each iteration, so we need to take address in underlying slice.

Result variable inside for-loop actually have the same address on each iteration, so we need to take address in underlying slice.
@demget demget added this to the v3.2 milestone Jun 7, 2023
@MikhailChe MikhailChe closed this Sep 14, 2023
@MikhailChe MikhailChe deleted the fix-set-result-id-should-be-unique branch September 14, 2023 10:53
@demget
Copy link
Collaborator

demget commented Nov 19, 2023

@MikhailChe why did you close this PR?

@MikhailChe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MikhailChe why did you close this PR?

I guess I was just cleaning up something and closed it by accident.

@MikhailChe MikhailChe restored the fix-set-result-id-should-be-unique branch November 20, 2023 08:59
@MikhailChe MikhailChe reopened this Nov 20, 2023
@demget demget changed the base branch from v3 to v3.2 November 20, 2023 10:30
@demget demget merged commit e6590d8 into tucnak:v3.2 Nov 20, 2023
1 check passed
@demget
Copy link
Collaborator

demget commented Nov 20, 2023

Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants