Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Plausible deniabiility #2852

Open
1 task done
CyberTailor opened this issue Nov 18, 2022 · 4 comments
Open
1 task done

[Feature Request] Plausible deniabiility #2852

CyberTailor opened this issue Nov 18, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@CyberTailor
Copy link

Implement "Hidden accounts" feature. It would work like that:

  1. User presses and holds current profile's avatar
  2. Activity opens and asks for a PIN code
  3. Hidden accounts are now shown in the list
  • I searched or browsed the repo’s other issues to ensure this is not a duplicate.
@viscountexx
Copy link

Is there a purpose to this feature? The phrasing of "plausible deniability" makes me wonder what the actual use case is here.

@CyberTailor
Copy link
Author

Yes, if you're a political dissident in a country with an authoritarian regime (Russia, Belarus, Iran, ...).

@charlag
Copy link
Collaborator

charlag commented Nov 20, 2022

It might also be useful for some closeted queer people to have hidden accounts but it is a big task, including notifications, share menu etc.

@realpixelcode
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, if you're a political dissident in a country with an authoritarian regime (Russia, Belarus, Iran, ...).

I think it would be too risky for them to store anything like that on a smartphone. They would/should only use Tor browser sessions.

Also, having to enter a PIN doesn't guarantee plausible deniability. It only would if the hidden profile was encrypted in such a way that, even when analysing Tusky's storage, there would be no way of determining whether there's a profile hidden in the encrypted BLOB. That would basically be equivalent to implementing something like VeraCrypt.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants