Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show pq padlock symbol for sent mail, tutadb 1788 #6699

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

bedhub
Copy link
Contributor

@bedhub bedhub commented Mar 13, 2024

To show the pq padlock symbol for the sender we introduced another enum value for the encryptionAuthStatus on Mail instances which is only set for the sent mail. It is only set in case the mail is confidential and all recipients support the TutaCrypt protocol.

see tutadb1788

@bedhub bedhub changed the title Draft: Show pq padlock symbol for sent mail, tutadb 1788 Show pq padlock symbol for sent mail, tutadb 1788 Mar 14, 2024
@bedhub bedhub added the model changes The code that was implemented to close this issue includes model changes and requires server release label Mar 14, 2024
To show the pq padlock symbol for the sender we introduced another enum value for the encryptionAuthStatus on Mail instances which is only set for the sent mail. It is only set in case the mail is confidential and all recipients support the TutaCrypt protocol.
@vaf-hub vaf-hub force-pushed the 1788-add-pqpadlock-symbol-for-sent-mail branch from 5185d62 to 9ed92b1 Compare May 2, 2024 13:30
@vaf-hub vaf-hub added this pull request to the merge queue May 6, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit fd38eed May 6, 2024
1 check passed
@vaf-hub vaf-hub deleted the 1788-add-pqpadlock-symbol-for-sent-mail branch May 6, 2024 09:11
@vaf-hub vaf-hub added this to the 227.240506 milestone May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
model changes The code that was implemented to close this issue includes model changes and requires server release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants