-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch to logical requires #103
Conversation
Avdi in Ruby Tapas 242: > Setting up a gem to use logical require paths internally is even > easier. Since RubyGems automatically adds the gem’s lib directories to > the load path, in that case we don’t need to mess around with the load > path at all.
WIP because I didn't look at the specs |
Are we gonna finish this one up? |
I hope so :) |
Do we need specs? |
Not sure what the original comment was referring to, but I don't think we need specs to ensure we use require properly. I thought it meant remove |
We don't seem to have any left. |
Yeah, the tests we have should be sufficient for this change |
Build failed due to network problems in the Travis CI container (time out when fetching gems), restarted |
Avdi in Ruby Tapas 242: