Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move 'wear' action to 'garments' module #82

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 22, 2016

Conversation

glyph
Copy link
Member

@glyph glyph commented Jul 11, 2016

In support of #55 and #54, start to split out an action from the too-long action module.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 11, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 93.052% when pulling 9065237 on glyph:separate-wear-action into dd919cb on twisted:master.

player.thing,
u" wrestles with basic personal problems."])))

evt = events.Success(
Copy link
Member

@ashfall ashfall Jul 12, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand that this is "just" moving the action to a different module, but while you are at it - Is there a specific reason why the name evt is used instead of something slightly more descriptive?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

woohoo a code review!

I could avoid naming the variable entirely; after all, it's just created, then broadcast. No name is better than a bad name :). What do you think?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to "no name is better than a bad name" in this case, since events.Success(...) makes sense to me.

@ashfall
Copy link
Member

ashfall commented Jul 22, 2016

LGTM.

@glyph
Copy link
Member Author

glyph commented Jul 22, 2016

Thanks for re-reviewing … near instantaneously :). Will merge when CI is happy.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 93.052% when pulling c1e9dcc on glyph:separate-wear-action into dd919cb on twisted:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 22, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.001%) to 93.05% when pulling c1e9dcc on glyph:separate-wear-action into dd919cb on twisted:master.

@glyph glyph merged commit 9886934 into twisted:master Jul 22, 2016
@glyph glyph deleted the separate-wear-action branch July 22, 2016 04:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants