New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds WriteError func for writing Twirp errors to http.ResponseWriter #192
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or return the error to the caller and let them log/ignore?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah! You're completely right that this is a very different situation from the generated code. This should most certainly be able to return an error.
It's unfortunate that this would be a breaking change and require a major version bump. This is why public API is hard. Ouch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed this could return an error, and probably should within this pkg.
But on the flip-side, it would no longer be a drop-in replacement to the generated version of
WriteError
.In our case we were importing stub packages in various places outside the twirp stack, so it made sense to have it this way.
But it wouldn't be too hard to refactor with the returned error (we'd probably drop it anyways).
Maybe in a v6 we could add a returned error, or in v5 add a new function that returns the underlying error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would technically break the public API, but would not do so in a code-breaking way.
Since this function doesn't return anything, all existing code would look like
This would not break if you started returning errors. i.e. you can get away with adding it in a minor version.
If that feels too close to the edge of the dark side.
💯
I do not claim to know how to cleanly fix a public API. Probably something like this work?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this discussion - let's move it to an issue though, since I don't think anybody else is seeing this :) @ofpiyush, can you make an issue?