You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm having trouble determining what might cause a "Defensive" action.
For instance, say I create a library that uses GPL. I discover that a IPA holder uses it, but fails to publish the code/include copyright statement/etc. If I sought correction, would that trigger a "Defensive" action of being sued for any patent related content my library (or other libraries I may have authored) may contain?
The above is just one potential non-patent related scenario that could trigger the defense mechanism. I can easily imagine others.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If the term "intellectual property lawsuit" in 2(a) was replaced with "patent infringement lawsuit," would your concern be alleviated? If so, I believe this is a duplicate of #1 (that is being considered by @benltwitter).
I'm having trouble determining what might cause a "Defensive" action.
For instance, say I create a library that uses GPL. I discover that a IPA holder uses it, but fails to publish the code/include copyright statement/etc. If I sought correction, would that trigger a "Defensive" action of being sued for any patent related content my library (or other libraries I may have authored) may contain?
The above is just one potential non-patent related scenario that could trigger the defense mechanism. I can easily imagine others.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: