Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we have clarification regarding what "Defensive" means? #15

Closed
jrconlin opened this issue Apr 18, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

Can we have clarification regarding what "Defensive" means? #15

jrconlin opened this issue Apr 18, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

@jrconlin
Copy link

I'm having trouble determining what might cause a "Defensive" action.

For instance, say I create a library that uses GPL. I discover that a IPA holder uses it, but fails to publish the code/include copyright statement/etc. If I sought correction, would that trigger a "Defensive" action of being sued for any patent related content my library (or other libraries I may have authored) may contain?

The above is just one potential non-patent related scenario that could trigger the defense mechanism. I can easily imagine others.

@JaredCrawford
Copy link
Contributor

If the term "intellectual property lawsuit" in 2(a) was replaced with "patent infringement lawsuit," would your concern be alleviated? If so, I believe this is a duplicate of #1 (that is being considered by @benltwitter).

@jrconlin
Copy link
Author

Yes, I believe it would address most of the concerns.

Closing the issue as a duplicate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants