At its core, Engineer is a static website generator. In other words, Engineer let's you build a website from a bunch of files - articles written in Markdown, templates, and other stuff - and outputs another bunch of files - HTML, mostly - that you can then copy wherever you want.
But Engineer has some pretty nifty features that you might find enticing. You can read more about the project at http://engineer.readthedocs.org/ or grab the code at http://github.com/tylerbutler/engineer.
Licensed under the MIT license.
Write posts from anywhere
Posts can be written/edited in Markdown and stored/synchronized using Dropbox or another file synchronization solution.
Preview your site locally
Engineer includes a small development web server that you can use to preview your site locally without deploying anywhere.
Manage your site remotely
Even baked sites need a little management, and many existing static generators require you to load up the terminal and execute a command to rebuild your site. Engineer lets you do that, of course, but also provides Emma, a built-in mini management site (optional) that lets you do most of the common management tasks remotely.
Themes make it easy to change your site's appearance
Themes provide flexibility in the site look and feel without starting from scratch or rewriting a bunch of content. You can write your own themes as well.
Use LESS instead of CSS
Engineer lets you use LESS instead of CSS if you'd like. LESS can either be preprocessed on the server (requires
lessc be installed on non-Windows systems) or processed client-side using less.js.
Despite all of these great features, there are some things that you might not like:
No built-in search
Search isn't built in. You can configure Google site search or something, but it's not baked into Engineer. But... do people really use anything besides Google/Bing to find stuff anyway?
Dynamic things require a bit more work
Might not fit your site's needs
If you have a lot of one-off pages (template pages or other such things) then managing them can get a bit cumbersome. Engineer really excels when a majority of your site's content has a similar look and feel and you can leverage the post metadata for a majority of your content. Engineer isn't limited to blogs, per se, but it does make some assumptions that most of your content comes in the form of articles.
Only supports Markdown and Jinja 2
While ideally this will not always be true, currently Engineer requires your posts be written in Markdown and any templates you create be written in Jinja 2. This may change in the future, but for now you have to use those two languages.
Engineer is not a CMS
If you're looking for a full-blown content management system, then... keep looking. Engineer is decidedly not what you want. Engineer operates on the basic principle that your content is stored in text files with minimal metadata in the files themselves, so if you're looking for rich URL management, image/file manipulation capabilities, etc., Engineer will make you very sad. It's not designed to do that stuff.