Expose constructors for interval types #1325
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi! I'd like to use intervals for which I know for example are only going to be of type
[a, ∞)
, but using the constructorInterval.atOrAbove
returns anInterval
rather than anAbove
instance, so the ability to extract the lower bound as an exactValueBound
usingx.lowerBound
is lost AFAICS.I think changing the return types would break binary compatibility, so this PR adds new methods on the companion which are in turn called by the corresponding methods on
Interval
, specifically for:Above
Below
All
Empty
I think the constructors for these objects were leaked before, and included the internal
flags
value, and in general I'm not sure how much theAbove
,Below
, etc are intended for general usage, but let me know any thoughts anyway 🙂Thanks!