Lenses and indexed state #34
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@pthariensflame Ok wow, |
|
@maxpow4h I don't see why not! I'll make that change. |
|
@maxpow4h Done! |
|
Thanks a lot! Lenses for all indeed! 😃 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since I just added
IxCont, I felt like I should also implementIxState, and in the process I realized that the prior implementation of lenses was kind of ad-hoc, so I replaced it with a more capable implementation based on coalgebroids of the indexed store comonad (not implemented separately for now).