feat(eslint-plugin): remove no-useless-template-literals

[y-hsgw]

BREAKING CHANGE:
Removes a deprecated rule.

PR Checklist

• Addresses an existing open issue: fixes Enhancement: [no-useless-template-literals] Delete in v8 #9163
• That issue was marked as accepting prs
• Steps in Contributing were taken

Overview

Removed no-useless-template-literals rule.

[typescript-eslint]

Thanks for the PR, @y-hsgw!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!

---

🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	2936bd5
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/665d3c1b1c625d00082c7daf
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-9207--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 99 (🟢 up 1 from production) Accessibility: 100 (no change from production) Best Practices: 92 (no change from production) SEO: 98 (no change from production) PWA: 80 (no change from production) View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 2936bd5. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

✅ Successfully ran 32 targets

• nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false
• nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false
• nx run-many --target=test --parallel --exclude integration-tests --exclude website --exclude website-eslint
• nx test eslint-plugin
• nx test utils --coverage=false
• nx test visitor-keys --coverage=false
• nx test typescript-eslint --coverage=false
• nx run types:build
• nx test parser --coverage=false
• nx test type-utils --coverage=false
• nx test scope-manager --coverage=false
• nx run repo-tools:postinstall-script
• nx test rule-schema-to-typescript-types --coverage=false
• nx test repo-tools --coverage=false
• nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false
• nx test ast-spec --coverage=false
• nx run-many --target=build --parallel --exclude=website --exclude=website-eslint
• nx run-many --target=lint --parallel --exclude eslint-plugin
• nx test typescript-estree
• nx test utils
• nx test visitor-keys
• nx test type-utils
• nx test parser
• nx test typescript-eslint
• nx test scope-manager
• nx test eslint-plugin-internal
• nx test rule-schema-to-typescript-types
• nx test repo-tools
• nx test ast-spec
• nx run integration-tests:test
• nx run-many --target=typecheck --parallel
• nx run repo-tools:generate-configs

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

LGTM, thanks! 🔪

Just a couple of requests around a "tombstone" docs page. Linking to #8548 so we remember this when we document the process.

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

Almost!

[kirkwaiblinger]

Just want to call out that this will probably cause merge conflicts when #8688 and #8673 get merged to main. But, the resolution is basically trivial (prefer this changeset over the other one), so I'm guessing there's no reason to consider blocking the PR or anything.

cc @JoshuaKGoldberg

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

Yup, agreed!

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

Thanks!

[kirkwaiblinger]