Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

finish up tiny-osmpbf based pbf implementation #61

Open
3 tasks
tyrasd opened this issue Nov 24, 2016 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks

finish up tiny-osmpbf based pbf implementation #61

tyrasd opened this issue Nov 24, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
3.0

Comments

@tyrasd
Copy link
Owner

tyrasd commented Nov 24, 2016 •
edited
Loading

  • add tests
  • write documentation 3.0 documentation #57
  • decide if this needs to be integrated more closely into the library.
@tyrasd tyrasd added this to the 3.0 milestone Nov 24, 2016
@tyrasd tyrasd mentioned this issue Nov 24, 2016
Closed
tyrasd added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 24, 2016
@tyrasd
use tiny-osmpbf to process pbf files
1ea8a32 
replaces and closes #28

still todo (see #61):
* tests
* documentation
* browser support?
@tyrasd tyrasd mentioned this issue Nov 24, 2016
Open
4 tasks
@tyrasd
Copy link
Owner Author

tyrasd commented Nov 24, 2016

decide if this needs to be integrated more closely into the library

The question here is, if tiny-osmpbf should be fully integrated into osmtogeojson (i.e. osmtogeojson(pbf_data) would work), or if users should simply opt-in by using both libraries “in series” when working with pbf files (i.e. osmtogeojson(tiny_osmpbf(pbf_data))) and the readme to have a nice explanation of what to do in order to parse pbf if using the library. Hmm…

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tyrasd