Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
https://github.com/NanoMeow/QuickReports/issues/2788
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
3 additions
and
3 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is causing anti-adblock messages. Can this be reverted? See: https://forums.lanik.us/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=44195&p=152501 Was re-reported again https://community.brave.com/t/message-blockers-on-websites-how-to-remove-it/102494
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a valid filter in my opinion.
You can badfilter it in brave but be aware that you will have to deal with anti adblock messages on many sites if you do, for example.
https://www.richmond.com/
without that filter.
And
https://www.themanual.com/travel/great-blasket-island-ireland-keeper-job/
etc.
The "interfering" message that is caused by the filter is fixed by adding
example.com##+js(nostif, removeChild, 100)
or@@||example.com^$generichide
.marca.com
is already fixed inEasyListSpanish
. I will fixelmundo.es
inuBO-filters
.08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
478f8ea
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't
##+js(acis, googlefc)
work ? Because that's what I suggest everywhere when google funding notices appear.08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No.
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is
contributor.google.com
also blocked ?08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a rhetorical question?
Is it blocked on your end with a default setup?
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it's a question but not related to the previous one, it is blocked but with my own blocking filter.
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
contributor.google.com
is used for different messages - including opt-out messages to comply with GDPR - not only anti-adblock ones, so blocking it completey could lead to site breakage and is out of scope ofuBO-filters
anyway in my opinion.It is blocked in the enhanced tracking list.
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I asked because I wanted to remove that domain from my list, but I can't unless it's blocked in uBO Filters, guess I will have to keep it then.
Has breakage occurred anywhere ?
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not blocked, so I don't know but blocking GDPR related stuff has lead to broken videos on numerous occasions.
Note that the breakage only occurs with a EU IP most of the time, so testing is also not straightforward.
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you block
contributor.google.com
outright, it'll create the the same Anti-adblock bottom div. We had it in EP and removed it, was just being used as an Adblock check.08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ryanbr I won't block it and on the issue you raised adding
won't solve the anti adblock issue.
which is presumably why mapx- changed the filter with this commit,
Blocking only
||fundingchoicesmessages.google.com^$xhr,3p
achieves nothing as far as I can see.
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do the same thing on foxnews/foxbusiness. I'm refering to the bottom yellow bar, other anti-adblocks won't be stopped.
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The yellow bar at foxnews/foxbusiness is fixed in
uBO-filters
.Without
uBO-filters
blocking only||fundingchoicesmessages.google.com^$xhr,3p
will fix the yellow "interference" bar but why are you blocking the xhr requests? I don't see the point.
There is no "Please allow ads" adblock message that would be fixed by blocking those xhr-requests at foxnews/foxbusiness.
To be clear I am not saying that you should not badfilter
||fundingchoicesmessages.google.com^$3p
in your brave list.I am just saying that you then will have to deal with the anti adblock messages I highlighted above on a site by site basis.
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fundingchoices is basically a anti-adblock google check. If any site deploying it fundingchoices will get anti-adblock message. If the scope is limited to only $xml requests its fine, no warnings given.
2 examples:
https://secure.fanboy.co.nz/gif/elmundo-google-choice.gif
Foxnews (whitelist needed to show the same issues)
https://secure.fanboy.co.nz/gif/fox-google-choice.gif
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that on some sites blocking it will result in the yellow bar without any noticable benefit.
On sites that use the hard anti adblock google contributor wall the benefit of blocking it is that it will fix the wall issue and one can continue to use the site without disabling ones blocking extension.
These sites have the anti adblock wall issue, on some a US IP is necessary to reproduce and there will be more.
The sites will need an extra filter in the brave list after the badfilter.
Blocking only the xhr-requests won't fix that issue.
That is why we block all
fundingchoices
requests and deal with the soft, i.e. one can continue to use the site, yellow "interference" warning and disable that warning on a site by site basis.08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please @okiehsch pasting the same message as before, I'm only refering to the Bottom Yellow anti-adblock message. See my gif's. My suggestion won't fix other Anti-adblock checks.
Let me re-state:
||fundingchoicesmessages.google.com^$third-party
. You will get a bottom Yellow warning anti-adblock on any site deploying fundingchoices.This won't fix other anti-adblock messages being deployed.
Can I get some input by @gorhill
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree 100% with that statement.
I really don't understand the issue here, just badfilter it if you disagree, I only wanted to highlight that your filter
||fundingchoicesmessages.google.com^$xhr,3p
does not fix the other anti-adblock message on the sites I mentioned, which is the reason I am against changing the current filter in
uBO-filters
, that's all.08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is history behind this block. We had this filter in Easyprivacy a while ago, It worked initially (14 Sept) easylist/easylist@44b3c70 without issue. Google decided to use it as a test for adblock scripts (14th Nov): easylist/easylist@a911ebb Which is why it was removed. Seemed pointless to block domain, with its only intention to detect and spit out warning messages.
Maybe related to warnings:
! https://hg.adblockplus.org/easylist/rev/46138acfc93b
||contributor.google.com^*/loader.js$third-party
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not the only thing that script does, it varies from site to site and it seems from time to time.
I just tested
foxbusiness.com
one more time and if I allow that script I seeI tested the same site yesterday and I did not get that message then.
I tested both times with a US IP.
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not seeing any anti-adblock messages on the foxnews/foxbusiness. (from a US ip, no uBlock filters) Even if I whitelist
global.fncstatic.com/static/isa/app/lib/google-funding-choices.js
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/odbviy/svg_images_doesnt_load_when_ublock_enabled/
08958ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can reproduce.
ea0e2dc