Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix an issue with maxSlack boundary updates. (#124)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Fixes #119
The solution is a copy from #120, but follows the testing framework
that we have - I did not want us to have a real `Sleep` in tests.

I'm not exactly thrilled by the testing setup (especially the
milliseconds) or the clock itself, but I'm not willing to totally give
up on it like #120 proposes.
I also wanted ALL implementations of the ratelimiter to be tested,
not just the currently selected.

Might follow up with some testing cleanups and/or clock migration.
  • Loading branch information
rabbbit committed Mar 4, 2024
1 parent 60908a3 commit 9364ca3
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 30 additions and 3 deletions.
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions limiter_atomic_int64.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,9 +21,8 @@
package ratelimit // import "go.uber.org/ratelimit"

import (
"time"

"sync/atomic"
"time"
)

type atomicInt64Limiter struct {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -69,7 +68,7 @@ func (t *atomicInt64Limiter) Take() time.Time {
case timeOfNextPermissionIssue == 0 || (t.maxSlack == 0 && now-timeOfNextPermissionIssue > int64(t.perRequest)):
// if this is our first call or t.maxSlack == 0 we need to shrink issue time to now
newTimeOfNextPermissionIssue = now
case t.maxSlack > 0 && now-timeOfNextPermissionIssue > int64(t.maxSlack):
case t.maxSlack > 0 && now-timeOfNextPermissionIssue > int64(t.maxSlack)+int64(t.perRequest):
// a lot of nanoseconds passed since the last Take call
// we will limit max accumulated time to maxSlack
newTimeOfNextPermissionIssue = now - int64(t.maxSlack)
Expand Down
28 changes: 28 additions & 0 deletions ratelimit_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ import (
type testRunner interface {
// createLimiter builds a limiter with given options.
createLimiter(int, ...Option) Limiter
// takeOnceAfter attempts to Take at a specific time.
takeOnceAfter(time.Duration, Limiter)
// startTaking tries to Take() on passed in limiters in a loop/goroutine.
startTaking(rls ...Limiter)
// assertCountAt asserts the limiters have Taken() a number of times at the given time.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -112,6 +114,16 @@ func (r *runnerImpl) startTaking(rls ...Limiter) {
})
}

// takeOnceAfter attempts to Take at a specific time.
func (r *runnerImpl) takeOnceAfter(d time.Duration, rl Limiter) {
r.wg.Add(1)
r.afterFunc(d, func() {
rl.Take()
r.count.Inc()
r.wg.Done()
})
}

// assertCountAt asserts the limiters have Taken() a number of times at a given time.
func (r *runnerImpl) assertCountAt(d time.Duration, count int) {
r.wg.Add(1)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -269,6 +281,22 @@ func TestInitial(t *testing.T) {
}
}

func TestMaxSlack(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
runTest(t, func(r testRunner) {
rl := r.createLimiter(1, WithSlack(1))

r.takeOnceAfter(time.Nanosecond, rl)
r.takeOnceAfter(2*time.Second+1*time.Nanosecond, rl)
r.takeOnceAfter(2*time.Second+2*time.Nanosecond, rl)
r.takeOnceAfter(2*time.Second+3*time.Nanosecond, rl)
r.takeOnceAfter(2*time.Second+4*time.Nanosecond, rl)

r.assertCountAt(3*time.Second, 3)
r.assertCountAt(10*time.Second, 5)
})
}

func TestSlack(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// To simulate slack, we combine two limiters.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 9364ca3

Please sign in to comment.