Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better support for jsRoutes #56

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2018
Merged

Better support for jsRoutes #56

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2018

Conversation

jckr
Copy link
Contributor

@jckr jckr commented Aug 4, 2018

Previously, jsRoutes was taken as is - there was no reprocessing at all.
All routes that needed to appear in the table of contents had to be in mdRoutes.

The issue there is that mdRoutes mixed 2 kind of routes - those with documentations (as intended) and those with standalone components.

With this PR, we can go back to a model where mdRoutes contains only routes with markdown files (and can easily be generated instead of manually curated)

…in jsRoutes.

Previously, jsRoutes was taken as is - there was no reprocessing at all. All routes that needed to appear in the table of contents had to be in mdRoutes. The issue there is that mdRoutes mixed 2 kind of routes - those with documentations (as intended) and those with standalone components.
With this PR, we can go back to a model where mdRoutes contains only routes with markdown files (and can easily be generated instead of manually created)
@jckr
Copy link
Contributor Author

jckr commented Aug 4, 2018

(nb - this will be required for visgl/luma.gl#583)

@jckr jckr merged commit 268ba33 into master Aug 7, 2018
jckr added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2018
* add build sitemaps script

* regenerated docs

* Add files via upload

* Add files via upload

* Delete google319a4ae362a3a60e.html

* Add files via upload

* avoid scss variable if it doesnt exist (#54)

* can now pass path for automatic docs route generation (#57)

* This diff support creation of tables of content for routes described in jsRoutes. (#56)

Previously, jsRoutes was taken as is - there was no reprocessing at all. All routes that needed to appear in the table of contents had to be in mdRoutes. The issue there is that mdRoutes mixed 2 kind of routes - those with documentations (as intended) and those with standalone components.
With this PR, we can go back to a model where mdRoutes contains only routes with markdown files (and can easily be generated instead of manually created)

* add build sitemaps script

* regenerated docs

* update sitemap syntax

* before rebasing
@xintongxia xintongxia deleted the better-support-for-jsroutes branch October 9, 2019 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants