Revert gofuzz usage #5516
Merged
Revert gofuzz usage #5516
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3vilhamster
requested review from
Shaddoll,
neil-xie,
davidporter-id-au,
Groxx,
shijiesheng,
agautam478,
jakobht,
sankari165,
dkrotx,
taylanisikdemir and
demirkayaender
as code owners
3vilhamster
force-pushed
the
remove-gofuzz
branch
from
0a8ee44
to
87b80d0
Compare
taylanisikdemir
approved these changes
Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
I've removed gofuzz from serialization parser tests since our logic is more complicated and random data can lead to test failures, since data is changed during parse/unparse roundtrip.
Ive switched to manual data fill that should be easier to extend in case of missing fields.
Why?
How did you test it?
Potential risks
Release notes
Documentation Changes