Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor uplift trees by replacing dict with list #422

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Dec 1, 2021

Conversation

jeongyoonlee
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeongyoonlee jeongyoonlee commented Nov 30, 2021

Proposed changes

This PR refactors UpliftTreeClassifier and UpliftRandomForestClassifier in inference.tree.

Updates include:

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to CausalML?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have signed the CLA
  • Lint and unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

No change in public APIs except UpliftRandomForest.classes_, which now includes control_name as the first item.

Copy link
Collaborator

@paullo0106 paullo0106 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks really nice and helpful!

Copy link
Collaborator

@paullo0106 paullo0106 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants