Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Report summary statistics with parallel connections #5

Closed
totoCZ opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Report summary statistics with parallel connections #5

totoCZ opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@totoCZ
Copy link

totoCZ commented Feb 12, 2019

Hi,

It'd be nice to have a summary output like iperf3

[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.97 GBytes 5.12 Gbits/sec 11749 sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.03 sec 5.96 GBytes 5.11 Gbits/sec receiver

because

2019/02/12 13:00:19 0/10 report clientWriter rate: 1538 Mbps 3846 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 1/10 report clientWriter rate: 1388 Mbps 3471 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 2/10 report clientWriter rate: 1713 Mbps 4283 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 3/10 report clientWriter rate: 1370 Mbps 3425 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 5/10 report clientWriter rate: 1350 Mbps 3375 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 4/10 report clientWriter rate: 1416 Mbps 3540 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 6/10 report clientWriter rate: 1480 Mbps 3702 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 7/10 report clientWriter rate: 1161 Mbps 2903 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 8/10 report clientWriter rate: 1199 Mbps 2999 snd/s
2019/02/12 13:00:19 9/10 report clientWriter rate: 1475 Mbps 3689 snd/s

is not very helpful.
We have a network that requires multiple connections to reach max throughput.

@udhos
Copy link
Owner

udhos commented Feb 12, 2019

I have just pushed this sketch on branch 'aggregate': 623c9df

It adds aggregate information like this:

2019/02/11 23:06:58 aggregate reading: 11953 Mbps 29884 recv/s
2019/02/11 23:06:58 aggregate writing: 12119 Mbps 30300 send/s

How does it look for your need?

@totoCZ
Copy link
Author

totoCZ commented Feb 15, 2019

Yep, that would work. Aggregate charts would be even more awesome, but it's just fine like this. 👍

@udhos
Copy link
Owner

udhos commented Feb 15, 2019

I am merging this aggregate rate now, then I will thinker further about the charts.

@udhos udhos self-assigned this Jun 19, 2024
@udhos udhos added the stale label Jun 19, 2024
@udhos udhos closed this as completed Jun 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants