Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve discrepancy between API and actual behavior for n-best lists #11

Closed
tuetschek opened this issue Jul 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@tuetschek
Copy link
Member

The API description puts the elements of the n-best list inside translated, but the implementation puts them inside translation. translated then contains the individual sentences of a single n-best list member.

We should unify the behavior of the code with the API description or the other way round, whichever is more reasonable.

@tuetschek
Copy link
Member Author

The API description was basically right. Minor problems in the API descriptions were fixed in f59272e, 1b1aa2c, 6cbc52e, and 4636ba8. Code was fixed in 1f545ca.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant