Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

g2tmpl-1.10.2: backward compatibility issue on hafs cases #1441

Closed
jkbk2004 opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

g2tmpl-1.10.2: backward compatibility issue on hafs cases #1441

jkbk2004 opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

new version of g2tmpl-1.10.2 was installed on each RDHPCs. The regression tests of the ufs-wm (hafs_regional_atm, hafs_global_multiple_4nests_atm, hafs_regional_specified_moving_1nest_atm) show the baselines are different between g2tmpl-1.10.0 and g2tmpl-1.10.2. Validation is needed from UPP and HAFS teams.

@BinLiu-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

@jkbk2004 Thanks for creating this issue! @LinZhu-NOAA will help to communicate this with @WenMeng-NOAA to check/confirm if the changing results are expected. Thanks!

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

@jkbk2004 Please provide me the locations of two regression tests, I can take a look.

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@WenMeng-NOAA can you take a look at RegressionTests_orion.intel.log: /work/noaa/epic-ps/jongkim/UFS-RT-tests/pr-dev/tests? I set some regression tests with g2tmpl-1.10.2.

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@WenMeng-NOAA can you take a look at RegressionTests_orion.intel.log: /work/noaa/epic-ps/jongkim/UFS-RT-tests/pr-dev/tests? I set some regression tests with g2tmpl-1.10.2.

It's on Orion.

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jkbk2004 commented Mar 9, 2023

g2tmpl update was merged with #1544

@jkbk2004 jkbk2004 closed this as completed Mar 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants