Add priors to the UCT search #148
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
👍 can we put this on CGOS and test it out? |
|
Soon. I want to see if the latest version with the third set of priors (the one for the empty areas) makes the bot weaker again. It seems to slow it down some more and I want to test it locally first. Maybe I need to do some optimisiations. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is not ready for merging, but I wanted to record my statistics before I move on: Iomrascálaí won 44.2% (+/- 5.4%) out of 86 games. That is around 10% better than before. This is with only two priors (stolen from Michi) and it's especially impressive as the slowdown is massive as the prior calculation happens serially in the main thread.
I'll add another prior from Michi (concerning empty areas on the board) and then I guess we should merge it.